Fixed scope, fixed price
Priced by framework, boundary, and evidence volume, agreed in writing before work begins. Changes to scope are documented and priced separately, never slipped in.
Our method is built on one rule from the flight line: you don't sign off on what you haven't inspected. Every finding is tied to evidence we examined, rated on a published scale, and reviewed with you before it becomes final.
We agree on the framework, the boundary (systems, sites, documents, or programs in scope), the evidence you already hold, and the people we'll need time with. You get a fixed-scope, fixed-price statement of work before anything else happens.
Policies, configurations, screenshots, tickets, training records, code, and interviews, collected through a secure evidence exchange and organized against every control or success criterion in scope. We tell you exactly what's missing before we start testing.
We examine, interview, and test, following the assessment procedures the requirement itself publishes wherever they exist. Automated tooling supports the work; it never replaces the human judgment.
Before anything is final, we walk every finding with your team. If we misread a control, missed evidence, or rated something wrong, this is where it gets corrected. Nothing reaches the final report that your team hasn't seen.
A written report with an executive summary, scored results by domain, a severity-rated risk register, and a prioritized gap list any remediation team can execute. We brief leadership in plain English and stay available for your remediation team's questions.
You remediate with whoever you choose. When you're ready, we re-test the open findings and issue a verification report. Because we had no role in the fix, the closure is credible to anyone who reads it.
Ratings are driven by likelihood and impact against the framework's intent and your actual exposure, never by how much the fix would cost or who would do it.
| Critical | Control absent or failed in a way that creates immediate regulatory, contractual, or safety exposure. Address first. |
|---|---|
| High | Control materially deficient; likely to be cited by an assessor or block a user with a disability from completing a task. |
| Medium | Control partially implemented or inconsistently applied; would be cited but is not an immediate blocker. |
| Low | Minor deviation or documentation gap; fix in the normal course of business. |
| Observation | Not a finding. A practice worth improving or a risk worth watching. |
Evidence is the product. Opinions are free, and we don't sell those either.
Priced by framework, boundary, and evidence volume, agreed in writing before work begins. Changes to scope are documented and priced separately, never slipped in.
Most assessments are delivered remotely through a secure evidence exchange. On-site work is available across the DFW metroplex and, for government clients, by arrangement statewide.
Evidence is handled under a written confidentiality agreement, stored only for the engagement and any agreed retention period, and never used to market to you or anyone else.
Book a 30-minute scoping call. We'll confirm the framework, the boundary, and the evidence you already have, and you'll leave with a fixed-scope proposal. No pitch for services we don't offer.